Last weekend, the Sage wrote that the biggest threat to the
completion of a merger between defence giants BAE Systems and EADS was the
stiff resistance it faced from national governments, especially those on the
continent which own shares in the European firm.
In other words, although the deal made good business sense,
the politics was not so clear-cut.
And so it proved. On Wednesday, by which date the two
companies had to decide whether to continue with the negotiation process, it
was announced that the deal was being dropped. Demands by governments on all
sides had led to a stalemate, with intransigence from Germany in particular dashing
any hopes of a compromise.
Sunday’s article also lamented the right-wing media’s
eagerness to turn public opinion against any deal from the moment the idea was
unveiled. This week, the very same journalists have scrambled to tell the
nation that the mere possibility that BAE may not be able to survive on its own
also puts thousands of British jobs in the same jeopardy anyway.
Notwithstanding the apparent desire on the part of the
doomsayers to have it both ways, they are right to raise the prospect – previously
mooted by your correspondent – of a similar bid for BAE from across the
Atlantic, especially in the wake of this week’s events.
Although many in the defence industry may have suspected
that the British firm was primed for a takeover, the opening of talks with EADS
has confirmed it in the clearest possible terms.
However, the minefield that the British and European firms
and their governments have had to navigate – without success – may have
deterred bosses and investors at already-thriving companies such as Lockheed
and Boeing.
The attitude of the British government to this sort of transatlantic
alliance is also unclear. Job prospects aside, the message it would send to a
continent from which Britain has already begun to cut itself diplomatically adrift
would require careful consideration.
And, since nearly half of BAE’s revenue already comes from contracts
held in the US, the profit-making rationale for a tie-up with a giant American
rival is questionable.
One thing is for sure, though – nothing is likely to happen
soon. The United States is in full election mode, and with a lame-duck Congress
to follow before the victor’s inauguration, not to mention a widely anticipated
debate over the coming year about the superpower’s military strategy, a long
period of uncertainty beckons.
This deal may be dead, but the future of Britain’s defence
industry is still very much a live issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment