Today, Egyptians began voting to finally choose a successor
to President Hosni Mubarak, more than 16 months on from the revolution that
toppled him after 30 years of authoritarian rule. Their choice is between
Mubarak’s last prime minister, and a figurehead of one of the world’s most influential
Islamic political movements.
Tomorrow, the people of Greece get another chance not only to
elect their country’s lawmakers, but also effectively to cast their verdict on
whether the country should remain in the Eurozone. To do so would mean more
austerity; to exit would cause chaos across Europe. The favourites promise to
avert both dangers – this would probably end up delivering both.
With Egypt at the forefront of northern Africa’s democratic
awakening and Greece at the heart of Europe’s troubles, both continents are
holding their breath, as new eras look set to be defined. The stakes are high –
but how did it come to this?
In Egypt, the saturation of the middle ground in the first round
of voting diluted the support of one of the pre-election favourites, Amr
Moussa, opening the door for Ahmed Shafiq to win through to this weekend’s
run-off against Mohammed Mursi.
Until earlier this week, Mr Mursi looked all set to follow
up the Muslim Brotherhood’s success in last winter’s parliamentary elections by
defeating a man whose very eligibility for the election was in doubt due to his
links to the former regime.
However, Thursday’s judgements by Egypt’s Constitutional
Court – that the law that would have prevented Mr Shafiq from standing was
invalid, and to dissolve the fledgling parliament because the rules governing
the election were flawed – have blown the race wide open and created huge
uncertainty about what powers the new president will have.
The drafting of a new constitution has been abandoned for
now – paralysing the judiciary – and there will be no legislature for the new
executive to oversee. No wonder turnout today has been much lower than
expected – no-one has any clear idea exactly what it is they are electing.
In Greece, by contrast, the implications of tomorrow’s vote
could hardly be starker. The radical Syriza party claims that Greece can stay
in the euro whilst rejecting the terms of the bailout, but few believe this is
possible. Syriza’s stance exploits the fact that a majority of Greeks want to abandon
the conditions of the bailout, while (separately) most are in favour of keeping
the Euro. But the consensus is that Greece simply cannot have both.
If Syriza’s main opponents, the conservative New Democracy
party, can convince enough voters that maintaining the status quo is the lesser
of two evils, Europe will breathe a sigh of relief. If it cannot, the likely result
is another hung parliament, more weeks of wrangling, more crippling uncertainty
across the continent – and Greece running out of money as the bailout funds dry
up.
Some argue that Greece must stay in the Eurozone for its own
sake and that of its neighbours; others see no reason to continue to pander to
Brussels bureaucrats, and advocate an exit as an opportunity to rebuild the
country’s economy on its own terms – notwithstanding the inevitable currency devaluation
and spiralling inflation.
To stick with the old establishment or to chart a brave new
course – it’s a choice that Greece is not alone in facing this weekend.
No comments:
Post a Comment